TUCSON Meteorite
Iron with silicate inclusions, ungrouped
Found 1845
31° 51' N., 110° 58' W.
Tucson: a history revealed
Two masses of the Tucson meteorite were
found, the
ring-shaped Irwin-Ainsa mass and the paired, slab-shaped, Carleton mass.
The meteorites consist of 92 vol% iron with 8 vol% silicate inclusions
consisting of forsteritic olivine, pure enstatite, aluminous diopside, pure
anorthite and brezinaite. No fusion crust or heat-affected zone remains.
Tucson was formed by shear-deformation of a metal-silicate mixture, followed
by annealing and rapid cooling. Due to this rapid cooling, no Widmanstätten
structure is present upon etching, and Tucson is classified structurally as an
ataxite. Tucson is highly reduced and may be related to the similarly reduced
and Ge-depleted meteorites Santiago Papasquiero or Nedagolla.
Each of the Tucson masses has a unique
convoluted history. The first recovered and the largest of the two is the
1,400 pound (688 kg) ring-shaped mass, alternately called the Ring, Signet,
Ainsa, and Irwin-Ainsa Meteorite at various times in history. The other mass,
originally weighing 633 pounds (287 kg), is named the Carleton Meteorite for
the Civil War general who appropriated the piece for public display.
The first written description of the Ring
dates back to 1845. It was written in Spanish by a respected official of
Sonora, Mexico, named José Velasco. From a section of his treatise concerning
the state of Sonora, titled Mines of Iron, Lead, Copper, and Quicksilver,
he described a mountain pass (known today as Box Canyon) within the Sierra de
la Madera range (now the Santa Rita Mountains). This pass, located between
Tucson and Tubac, contained many large masses of pure iron, lying at the foot
of the mountains. He wrote of a medium-sized mass that was taken to Tucson, a
journey of over thirty rugged miles, where it had resided for many years
[before 1845], serving as an anvil for the garrison armorer/blacksmith.
Writing in his diary for May 31, 1849, the
'49er A. Clarke clearly described the find circumstances and provided details
of the appearance of the meteorite anvil used by the shoer of his mule.
Shortly thereafter, in his article of 1852, Notice of Meteoric Iron in the
Mexican Province of Sonora, Dr. John LeConte described the appearance and
recovery information of two meteoric anvils being used by blacksmiths in
Tucson. That same year, in his diary entry for July 17, boundary commissioner
John Bartlett described the origin and dimensions of the Ring mass and alluded
to a second large mass located within the garrison in Tucson. He also made a
detailed sketch of the celestial anvil, brought to light only in 1978.
Perhaps the most thorough description of
the two masses was written by John Parke, lieutenant in charge of a survey
expedition. He indicated that with much effort some small samples were
acquired and sent to the east for analysis. An analysis was performed by Dr.
Charles Shepard and published in 1854 in the American Journal of Science. He
reported the lack of crust and the oxidized nature of the meteorite sample,
along with its chemical composition.
It was a blacksmith named
Ramón Pacheco, who recovered the slab-like mass
on or about 1850, and put it to use as an anvil in Tucson. In 1856, the other
blacksmith anvil, the Ring, was abandoned leaving all the blacksmith duties to
Pacheco and his anvil. In 1862, Colonel James Carleton confiscated the Pacheco
anvil and had it shipped to San Francisco where permission was obtained to saw
off a specimen for analysis. The mass remained on display at the Society of
California Pioneers until 1939 when it was purchased by the Smithsonian to be
displayed alongside the Ring mass.
During the year 1860, a medical officer
named Bernard Irwin found the abandoned Ring mass and took possession of it on
behalf of the Smithsonian. The following year, the meteorite was contracted to
begin its journey from Arizona to Washington D.C. via Guaymas by Auguston
Ainsa. He took two years to haul the mass to the coast, where his brother,
Santiago Ainsa, took over the remaining leg to New York. Santiago was
primarily interested in glorifying the family name and contrived a false
history of the Ring mass in correspondence with the Smithsonian. In part, he
claimed the mass was recovered by his famous great grandfather, Juan Bautista
de Anza, in 1735 at a known location, and transported to Tucson. This legend,
along with his other claims, have been proven to be totally fabricated; but
not before the credit for the presentation of the Ring Meteorite to the
Smithsonian was given to the Ainsas, including naming the Ring meteorite the
Ainsa Meteorite.
When Irwin learned of this appalling turn
of events, he sent a letter to the Smithsonian, debunking Ainsa's fabricated
story and protesting their choice of names for the mass. He stated he would
rather they rename it the Tucson Meteorite rather than honor the fraudulent
claims of Santiago Ainsa. After all, the Ainsas had only contracted to carry
it to Washington for Irwin, the original donator to the Smithsonian. The name
was subsequently changed to the Irwin-Ainsa Meteorite, but Irwin was intent on
removing the name of Ainsa from the meteorite and publishing the correct
history of the mass. It took twelve years for the name to be changed at
Irwin's insistence to the Tucson Meteorite.
The 3.6 g specimen pictured above was
originally part of the inner "nodule" of the ring mass, and shows a
polycrystalline structure with flow patterns of silicate inclusions. The
Tucson Ring can be viewed today at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural
History in the Hall of Geology, Gems, and Minerals.
|